🔎 Trials Near Me

Home › Heart Diseases › NCT04124120

Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women

Recruiting

Randomized Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women (ROMA:Women) Trial

Who can join

Ages 18 and older · Women

Full eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Women patients ≥18 years old.
2. Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
3. Primary (first time) cardiac surgery procedure.
4. Significant disease of the left main coronary artery or of the left anterior descending and the circumflex coronary system with or without disease of the right coronary artery.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Male gender
* Single graft
* Emergency operation
* Myocardial infarction within 72 hours of surgery
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35%
* Any concomitant cardiac or non-cardiac procedure
* Previous cardiac surgery
* Preoperative severe end-organ dysfunction (dialysis, liver failure, respiratory failure), cancer or any co-morbidity that reduces life expectancy to less than 5 years.
* Inability to use the saphenous vein or to use both radial and right internal thoracic arteries
* Anticipated need for coronary thrombo-endarterectomy
* Planned hybrid revascularization

About the study

The central hypothesis of ROMA:Women is that the use of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) will improve clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) compared to single arterial grafting (SAG).

The specific aims of ROMA:Women are:

Aim 1: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,300 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. Differences by important clinical and surgical subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated. The women enrolled in the ongoing ROMA trial (anticipated to be approximately 690) will be included in ROMA:Women, increasing efficiency and reducing enrollment time.

Hypothesis 1.0. MAG will reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Hypothesis 1.1. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.

Aim 2: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on generic and disease-specific QOL, physical and mental health symptoms in women undergoing CABG. The investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG (including those enrolled in ROMA:QOL). Differences by important subgroups (as defined above) will also be evaluated.

Hypothesis 2.0. MAG will improve generic and disease-specific QOL compared to SAG.

Hypothesis 2.1. MAG will improve physical and mental health symptoms compared to SAG.

Hypothesis 2.2. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.

What is being tested

Sponsor: Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Participants: 2,300 · Started: Apr 17, 2023

Contact the study team

Official record on ClinicalTrials.gov — NCT04124120

Locations in the U.S.

CaliforniaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center, Pomona
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
ColoradoUniversity of Colorado, Aurora
ConnecticutHartford Hospital, Hartford
Yale University Hospital, New Haven
GeorgiaEmory University, Atlanta
IllinoisUniversity of Chicago, Chicago
IndianaIndiana University, Indianapolis
IowaUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City
MarylandJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore
MassachusettsBaystate Health, Springfield
MichiganUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak
MissouriWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis
NebraskaNebraska Heart Hospital, Lincoln (Not yet recruiting)
Methodist Physicians Health, Omaha
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
New JerseyEnglewood Health, Englewood
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark
The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood
New YorkNewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn
Columbia University Medical Center, New York
Lenox Hill Hospital, New York (Not yet recruiting)
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York
New York Presbyterian Queens, Queens
North CarolinaDuke University, Durham
East Carolina University, Greenville
Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem
OhioCleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (Not yet recruiting)
Ohio State University, Columbus
Genesis Healthcare System, Zanesville
PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh (Not yet recruiting)
Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood
Rhode IslandRhode Island Hospital, Providence
TexasBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas
The University of Texas Medical Health Branch at Galveston, Galveston
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio
UtahUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City

Conditions

From ClinicalTrials.gov, data retrieved Sep 29, 2026. Each study sets its own eligibility; the study team decides who can join.